![]() There is room as a buffer for a light real time malware scanner, it need not take up much resources as some providers have proven. People should stop doing the superiority complex dependency things that people make fun of Mac users for, it gives their arguments no credibility to the point where people outright ignore their self congratulatory ranting about inherent superiority. it only makes you less secure if the provider is doing it. The strange false sense of security people live in by thinking they are not at risk of anything by sticking to walled gardens.is like never going to the doctor so you don't get cancer.Įven if a real time scanner and sandboxer is superfluous. and no one willingly uses CCleaner anymore.Īt a minimum a scanner prodding activity in passing with heuristics enabled would have flagged this which would have prodded extra attention. The credibility of kaspersky is besides the point, the point is it's them that found this and now FDM has a credibility problem the same way CCleaner does that they are going to have to work real hard at fixing. Ad homonyms wont do anything to deligitimize the legitimate work being done if even by accident. ![]() which is not something someone would use something like this for. If everyone was paying attention it would probably have been found before but generally no one pays attention to Linux binaries nor do they develop products for Linux except on enterprise. ![]() keep in mind it was not one of the other players that found it. Kasperski does on occasion find things that no one else does. ![]() ![]() How the Internet security can be achieved in Kasperski edition? simple - acting like man in the middle, juggling certificates and reading all content before handling it to OS. Is it company which the US Federal Communications Commission banned for the unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States, forbidding companies from using FCC funds to purchase Kaspersky products. What it is real time security suite? how I can install it on Linux Mint? Is it something like Kasperski internet security suit produced by company which cited article referenced as a source? Is it Kasperski which was strangely not mentioned in security reviews like this one The Best Security Suites for 2023. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |